• Tokenized
  • Posts
  • ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ Ep. 72. Meta Is Coming for Stablecoins

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ Ep. 72. Meta Is Coming for Stablecoins

On Ep. 72 of Tokenized, Simon Taylor, GTM @ Tempo is joined by Nicole Sandler, Chief Ecosystem Officer @ Ubyx and Fredrik Haga, Co-Founder @ Dune to discuss onchain data showing stablecoin supply and exchange holding trends, Blueprint raising $4.25M and more!

If you're reading this and still haven't signed up, click the subscribe button below!

On Episode 72 of the Tokenized Podcast, Simon Taylor is joined by Nicole Sandler, Chief Ecosystem Officer at Ubyx Inc., and Fredrik Haga, Co-Founder of Dune. Nicole brings deep regulatory and institutional expertise, while Fredrik offers onchain data intelligence from one of crypto's most widely used analytics platforms. Together they unpack a packed week in stablecoins, from Meta's re-entry to Tether's expanding empire.

๐ŸŽ™๏ธListen to the full episode here on your favorite podcast app or ๐Ÿ“ท watch on YouTube.

We cover:

  • Why Meta's stablecoin play is fundamentally different from the Libra debacle of 2019

  • Stripe's 34% TPV growth, Bridge volume 4x-ing, and the rumored PayPal acquisition

  • PYUSD's 750% supply growth and what it says about stablecoin market share dynamics

  • How the GENIUS Act shapes big tech's stablecoin window before its November 2026 ban

  • Tether's evolution from trading coin to strategic holding company

  • Kraken's tokenized equity perpetual futures and the crypto-tradfi convergence

  • Why agentic AI and stablecoins are converging as a commerce rail

  • The onchain RWA market hitting $24 billion but still being dominated by T-bills

Meta's Second Act: Distribution, Not Monetary Sovereignty

Meta is reportedly piloting stablecoin integration across its 3-billion-user platform - and this time, the regulatory environment might actually let them do it.

The biggest story this week: Meta has sent stablecoin RFPs to several companies, with Stripe rumored as the front-runner pilot partner, targeting H2 2026 launch across Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp.

As Nicole Sandler put it bluntly: "2019 was essentially a new currency, and it was looking at monetary sovereignty. They asked forgiveness instead of permission." The difference now? "Back in 2019 Meta essentially picked a fight they couldn't win, because it was about monetary sovereignty. Now it's about market power. That is a fight they could win."

Fredrik Haga agreed the regulatory unlock is significant, but emphasized something else: "It's a more practical and sober time... it seems like they're not even building their own chain." Meta isn't trying to reinvent money - they're using established stablecoins and existing rails.

Sandler also flagged the infrastructure challenge: with 3 billion users and multiple stablecoins across multiple geographies, "it's a many-to-many problem, but in its most extreme form... bilateral integration cannot serve that scale." Neutral clearing infrastructure will be essential.

One detail worth noting: Patrick Collison sits on Meta's board, appointed April 2025 - making the Stripe-as-pilot-partner rumor feel less coincidental.

PYUSD's Quiet Surge and the Stripe-PayPal Question

Bloomberg reported that Stripe was considering acquiring all or parts of PayPal - a story that moved PayPal's stock 7%. The backdrop: PayPal's TPV growth sits at just 7%, barely above inflation, while Stripe is clocking 34% growth and added $500 billion in total processed volume in a single year.

But there's a stablecoin angle here that's easy to miss. As Haga pointed out: "PYUSD, their stablecoin, has actually grown tremendously last year. So it's up 750% in supply... their supply is at about 3 billion now, so they're actually basically about 1% on the total market." He noted this could even be an acquisition angle for Stripe given their own aggressive stablecoin plays - though he flagged a practical headache: "The PayPal team is 3x the size of the Stripe team. It's like 8,000 versus 27,000... it's kind of weird that the 8,000 people company is swallowing the 27,000 people company."

Meanwhile, stablecoin market share at the top remains remarkably fixed. Haga noted that despite 50% supply growth in the last year, "89% of the supply is still USDC and USDT, and it's actually pretty fixed." The lesson for latecomers: "Market share is very, very cheap" when a market is small. "By the time it's massive, market share is very, very expensive."

Nicole Sandler added a structural point worth watching: the $400 billion volume figure shows "the utility is decoupled from speculation. And I think that's a really important change, because there's always a lot of conversations where people get confused between crypto and stablecoins, and you're definitely seeing that change now."

Tether's Holding Company Trajectory

Tether's investment in Whop - a creator economy marketplace where creators have generated over $2 billion in sales - signals a broader strategic shift. Whop will integrate Tether's wallet development kit to enable USDT and USAT stablecoin payouts to creators.

As Haga noted, Tether is "going more aggressive into various categories and adjacent venues... if you have very long tail payouts, or like to sort of the edges of the network, and you have a lot of cross border stuff, and this creator economy, I can see how that fits their strategic objectives."

Sandler sharpened the framing: "What I thought was really interesting was that they were taking equity rather than just having a commercial partnership... that's increasingly making strategic equity investments across multiple companies, which could make them look less of a stablecoin issuer, and almost more like a holding company, with stablecoin distribution as a strategic logic."

With $10 billion in 2025 profit, investments in gold that make them one of the world's largest buyers outside central banks, and stores in Bolivia and Ecuador pricing goods in USDT - the modern-day Berkshire Hathaway comparison isn't as absurd as it once sounded.

Kraken's Tokenized Equity Perpetuals and the Crypto-TradFi Convergence

Kraken launched a tokenized equity perpetual futures exchange with 20x leverage - trading the S&P 500, NASDAQ, Nvidia, Apple, and Tesla around the clock. Meanwhile, Coinbase began offering tokenized equities as regular stocks. The pattern is clear: crypto exchanges are pushing hard into traditional asset classes.

Haga's take was characteristically balanced: "For a long time, there was a critique that there was all this fancy infrastructure, but no real assets, only magic beans on the blockchain... now you have stablecoins and real world assets. So why shouldn't these assets be available 24/7 around the globe?" On the leverage question, he acknowledged the tension: "You can ask a question like, okay, how far should you go in enabling retail speculation and day trading... but it seems like folks want it, so I think you might as well do it on the blockchain."

Sandler offered a regulatory reality check: "The regulatory scrutiny on 20 times leverage in the US will be pretty significant, or I'd expect it to be." Simon noted that perpetuals are structurally different from classic options and derivatives that are always time-bound - perpetuals have no expiry, which makes them a distinct consideration for market structure going forward.

Agentic Commerce: Early but Directionally Right

Haga offered a compelling framing on AI agents and crypto: "This concept of like, the function is payable, like you paid money and it executes, blew my mind. And I think still, 10 years later, that hasn't really been utilized in a large scale way. But now I think really with AI, if they want to transact... it's very easy to see that they should then want to finance something they're doing." He also flagged the x402 protocol for agent-to-agent payments without accounts or API keys as "super interesting," though volumes haven't seen runaway adoption yet.

Sandler brought it together by citing the Collison brothers' 2025 annual letter, which described agentic AI in commerce as "very in its early stages", and argued that "for agentic AI, stablecoins are a natural rail for agentic commerce, and that's why the Meta play is so interesting."

Looking Ahead

The through-line this week is convergence. Payments companies are becoming crypto companies (Stripe, PayPal). Crypto companies are becoming holding companies (Tether). Social platforms are becoming payment rails (Meta). And crypto exchanges are becoming stock brokerages (Kraken, Coinbase). The GENIUS Act's November 2026 deadline creates a forcing function - and any big tech company that hasn't figured out its stablecoin strategy by then may find itself locked out entirely. The companies positioning now are making bets that the stablecoin market's current size dramatically understates its future significance. As Haga put it: market share is cheap when a market is small. That window won't stay open forever.

Thanks so much for reading the Tokenized Newsletter!

Please share this edition or share it with your colleagues if you enjoyed it!

Disclaimers

This newsletter is for informational purposes only and is not financial, business or legal advice. These thoughts & opinions and do not represent the opinions of any other person, business, entity or sponsor. Any companies or projects mentioned are for illustrative purposes unless specified.

The contents of this newsletter should not be used in any public or private domain without the express permission of the author.

The contents of this newsletter should not be used for any commercial activity, for example - research report, consultancy activity, or paywalled article without the express permission of the author.

Please note, the services and products advertised by our sponsors (by use of terminology such as but not limited to; supported by, sponsored by, Made Possible by or brought to you by) in this newsletter could carry inherent risks and should not be regarded as completely safe or risk-free. Third-party entities provide these services and products, and we do not control, endorse, or guarantee the accuracy, efficacy, or safety of their offerings.

It's crucial to provide our readers with clear information regarding the inherent nature of services and products that might be covered in this newsletter, including those advertised by our sponsors from time to time. When you buy cryptoassets (including NFTs) your capital is at risk. Risks associated with cryptoassets include price volatility, loss of capital (the value of your cryptoassets could drop to zero), complexity, lack of regulation and lack of protection. Most service providers operating in the cryptoasset industry do not currently operate in a regulated industry. Therefore, please be aware that when you buy cryptoassets, you are not protected under financial compensation schemes and protections typically afforded to investors when dealing with regulated and authorised entities to operate as financial services firm.